VisAudit®
Why Visibility
Audit Process
Request Audit
Why LLM Visibility Matters
Imagine walking into a store to buy a birthday gift.
You know the kind of item you're looking for — but the shelves are a mess. Some products have no labels. Others are still in boxes. Some are sitting in the back room, never even put on display.
What do you do?
You walk past them — even if one of them is exactly what you need.
That’s how AI-powered tools like GPT-4, Claude, Bing Chat, and Perplexity experience your website.
They’re the shopper.
Your content is the product.
And LLM Visibility is the difference between your page sitting on the shelf with a clear tag — or collecting dust in the back.
The LLM Visibility Audit helps make sure your site is:
a) Findable (indexed, organized, and visible)
b) Understandable (tagged with the right metadata and structure)
c) Recommendable (ready to be pulled into AI-generated answers)
Each section below reflects a different step in that visibility journey — from shelf placement to label clarity to trusted packaging. Explore them to see how well your site is actually stocked for AI discovery.
Do you notify search engines or AI indexing tools when your content changes?
What this means:
Indexing tools (like Bing Chat, GPT-4, Claude) prioritize fresh, structured, and updated content — but only if you tell them when something changes.
If you're not submitting updates, your content could sit unnoticed for days or weeks.
IndexNow helps fix this:
IndexNow lets you instantly notify participating engines every time a page is published, updated, or deleted — skipping the crawl delay entirely.
Key Mechanism: IndexNow API Key .txt
File
Purpose: Proves domain ownership for secure URL submissions
Format: The file is named after your key and contains the key as its only content
Required to activate IndexNow
Think of it like this:
indexnow-key.txt
= your membership cardrobots.txt
= the rules of entry
Do you have a sitemap.xml
file — and is it properly referenced and submitted?
What this means:
Your sitemap is a directory of your content — a file that lists every page, blog post, product, or resource you want crawled and indexed.
But just having a sitemap isn’t enough. If it’s not referenced in key places, bots won’t know it exists.
Why referencing matters:
Referencing means explicitly pointing to your sitemap in places where search engines and AI bots are trained to look — especially your robots.txt
file.
If you don’t, AI systems like Bing Chat and GPT may:
Miss your newest pages
Index outdated content
Skip your site altogether
Best practice:
Add this line to your
robots.txt
:Sitemap: https://yourdomain.com/sitemap.xml
Submit your sitemap to Google, Bing, and IndexNow
When connected correctly, your sitemap becomes a real-time index signal for both search and LLM-powered engines.
What is it, and why does it matter?
Your robots.txt
file is the first thing crawlers and AI bots check when visiting your site. It tells them:
What they’re allowed to crawl
What they should avoid
Where to find your sitemap
Think of it like this:
robots.txt = the front gate
→ AI bots check this before deciding if they’re allowed insitemap.xml = the map inside
→ Tells them what rooms (URLs) exist and what’s inside each
Best practices:
Always host it at
https://yourdomain.com/robots.txt
Use clear permissions (allow/disallow)
Reference your sitemap explicitly
Ensure it allows AI bots like:
GPTBot
,ClaudeBot
,BingBot
,CCBot
, etc.
What this means:
Before you can use IndexNow to submit URL updates, you need to prove ownership of your domain.
This is done by creating a .txt file named after your API key, placing it at the root of your site, and making sure it’s accessible via public URL.
Without this key in place, your site can’t submit changes to Bing, Yep, Naver, or other IndexNow-enabled engines — meaning your content sits in a queue, waiting for crawlers that may never arrive.
Why this matters:
AI-indexing engines don’t crawl by default — they expect to be notified.
The IndexNow key file is your membership pass that tells these engines your site is verified and trusted to submit updates directly.
When it's connected correctly:
IndexNow allows you to instantly ping AI-aware bots whenever you publish, update, or delete content — skipping the crawl queue altogether and helping your changes surface faster in LLM-powered tools.
Crawlability of Key Pages – Can Bots Actually Reach Your Best Content?
Are your high-value pages open to search and AI indexing bots?
What this means:
You may think your content is “live,” but bots often can’t reach it because of:
robots.txt
blocksnoindex
tagsBroken links
JavaScript-rendered content that’s invisible to crawlers
If your best pages can’t be accessed, they can’t be included in AI answers — or even traditional search results.
Why this matters:
Crawlability is step one.
No crawl = no context = no citation.
Bots need to find and successfully load your content to:
Summarize it
Score it for AI visibility
Surface it in LLM-powered tools like Bing Chat or Claude
Pro tip:
Even pages with clean content won’t rank or be summarized if they’re hidden behind crawling issues. AI can’t use what it can’t access.
Do bots know which version of your page to trust and use?
What this means:
Search engines and AI systems encounter multiple versions of a page all the time — especially in blogs, ecommerce, paginated content, or UTM-laden URLs.
Your site must clearly tell them:
What’s allowed to be crawled (
robots.txt
)Which version is the official one (
rel="canonical"
)
If you don’t, AI systems may cite or index the wrong version — or none at all.
Best practices:
robots.txt
Should live at:
https://yourdomain.com/robots.txt
Should allow LLM crawlers (e.g., GPTBot, BingBot, ClaudeBot)
Should reference your sitemap explicitly
Canonical tags
Should point to the cleanest, most accurate version of the page
Should exist on every key page, including self-referencing canonicals
Help prevent duplication in AI models, especially with syndication or paginated content
Why this matters:
Bots don’t just need access — they need clarity.
When your canonical and robots strategies are aligned, you control what gets remembered, summarized, and cited.
Are your pages structured using clean, logical headers (<h1>
, <h2>
, etc.)?
What this means:
LLMs don’t scroll — they scan your HTML. Your content needs to be structured like an outline, with headings that clearly explain each section’s purpose.
Bots like GPTBot and ClaudeBot read from your code, not your design. If your page is built with <div class="big-text">
instead of real headings like <h2>
, the AI sees a wall of noise — not meaning.
Why this matters:
AI models use headings to determine topic segmentation and hierarchy of ideas
Poorly structured pages confuse bots, reduce summarization quality, and lower your retrievability in AI tools
LLMs prioritize content that’s cleanly chunked and labeled
Best practices:
One
<h1>
per page — clear, audience-specificUse nested headings in order:
<h2>
,<h3>
, etc.Avoid skipping levels (don’t go from
<h2>
to<h5>
)Make headings descriptive, not decorative
Language Clarity – Are You Writing for Summarization or Just for Search?
Is your content structured and written in a way that LLMs can summarize and reuse clearly?
What this means:
LLMs prioritize plain, human-readable explanations over keyword-packed fluff.
They’re trained to generate answers that match how humans talk and think — so if your content is full of jargon, unnatural sentence structures, or bullet-stuffed copy, you’re less likely to be surfaced.
Why this matters:
LLMs often summarize or quote your content verbatim
Clear, answer-style writing makes it easier to extract useful insights
Conversational tone with direct value to the user → more likely to be retrieved
Best practices:
Use short sentences, clear structure, and answer-style phrasing
Avoid keyword stuffing or SEO-first phrasing like:
“Our digital transformation cloud software platform solution...”Instead, use:
“This guide helps IT teams choose cloud tools for digital transformation.”Write for clarity and answerability, not just ranking
Do you include AI-specific tags like data-ai-summary
, or write your meta tags to be used in summaries by LLMs?
What this means:
Search engines used to index your pages and let users decide. But now, LLMs like GPT-4, Claude, and Bing Chat generate answers — often pulling directly from your summary tags.
Tags like data-ai-summary
give you a plain-language label that AI can use to understand and cite your page.If you don’t tell them what the page is for, they’ll guess — or skip it.
Why this matters:
LLMs quote structured summary tags verbatim in search and chat results
Summary tags influence how your content is summarized, retrieved, and cited
They help LLMs know: who it’s for, what it does, why it matters
Best practices:
Add
data-ai-summary
to key content sectionsWrite summaries like an LLM answer, not a tagline
Test: Paste your summary into GPT and ask, “Would this help someone choose this page?”
Use plain, concise phrasing that includes audience + benefit
Add to your CMS templates or Framer components so it’s built-in
Do your pages include complete Open Graph metadata and preview signals for AI?
What this means:
OG tags like og:title
, og:description
, and og:image
define how your content appears in:
Bing Chat previews
Perplexity cards
GPT-generated link summaries
LinkedIn/Twitter posts
LLM visual interfaces
If they’re missing, broken, or duplicated, AI tools generate their own — and the result is usually generic or off-brand.
Why this matters:
Open Graph is now used far beyond social media
It shapes how your brand appears in AI-generated UI (e.g., cards, summaries, quotes)
Clean OG tags improve click-through and answer inclusion
Best practices:
Every page should have a unique:
og:title
(headline-style, audience-aware)og:description
(clear outcome or value)og:image
(800x418, branded, not just a logo)
Use fallback
meta
tags for AI compatibilityAvoid repeating your title in the description
Run preview tests in:
Bing or Perplexity preview tools
Do you use structured schema across your key pages — and the right types for each content format?
What this means:
Structured data (in JSON-LD format) helps AI and search engines understand what a page is — not just what it says. But just adding a generic WebPage
type isn’t enough.
Using schema types like Product
, Service
, FAQ
, Organization
, or HowTo
tells LLMs what function your content serves — which is essential for citation, summarization, and trust.
Why this matters:
Schema is now part of AI comprehension, not just SEO
GPT-4, Claude, Bing Chat, and Perplexity all ingest structured data
The more specific and accurate your schema, the more useful your content becomes in answers and context windows
Best practices:
Use specific schema types — not just
WebPage
Tag your home page with
Organization
Tag solutions and offerings with
Product
orService
Add
FAQ
andHowTo
schema wherever helpfulUse tools like Schema.org, Google's Structured Data Tool, or a CMS plugin to validate types
Schema-Content Alignment – Does Your Schema Actually Match What’s on the Page?
Are your schema types, properties, and values aligned with your real page content?
What this means:
Many sites copy and paste schema templates, but the values don’t match the page. That confuses bots.
If your schema says the page is a Product
but there’s no product info… or your FAQ
answers are vague or missing — AI will ignore it, or worse, trust the wrong signals.
Why this matters:
LLMs expect structured data to confirm what’s in the visible content
Mismatched schema lowers trust and may result in ignored or penalized signals
Aligned schema = higher accuracy in AI answers and previews
Best practices:
Only use schema types that reflect the actual page purpose
Match schema
name
,description
,mainEntity
, etc. to content on-pageAvoid boilerplate or “stubbed” schema just to pass validators
Think: Does this structured data tell the same story as the visible page?
Even if your schema is present — is it clean, plain-language, and LLM-optimized?
What this means:
Just “validating” your schema isn’t enough. Most validators don’t check readability — they only check structure.
But LLMs like GPT-4 and Claude read schema as part of the page. If your fields are full of IDs, codes, or vague labels, AI can’t summarize or retrieve the page well.
Why this matters:
Schema that’s messy or cryptic hurts your chance of being included in an answer
LLMs extract summaries from schema fields — not just body copy
Clarity boosts answerability and model trust
Best practices:
Write values in plain, descriptive language
Don’t use product codes as names (
ABC-3000X
) — say what it isValidate not just for structure (e.g., Google Rich Results), but for LLM interpretability
Treat schema like a secondary summary layer
Have you tested whether LLMs are seeing, citing, or using your structured data?
What this means:
AI tools don’t just index — they summarize and synthesize.
If you want your schema to help you show up in GPT, Claude, Bing Chat, or Perplexity, you need to test it.
That means prompting those tools to summarize your page or cite its content — then seeing if the schema plays a role in how the answer is constructed.
Why this matters:
Your structured data might be present — but totally ignored
Prompt-based testing helps you tune your schema for retrieval, not just validation
This is your feedback loop for optimizing content design for AI
Best practices:
Run prompts in GPT/Claude like:
“What is [page URL] about?” or “Summarize this product page”Compare the AI’s response to your schema fields
If the answer ignores key info, revise your schema accordingly
Make testing part of your schema QA process, not just an afterthought
Request Your Audit
Audit
Overview
Features
Process
Company
About
Contact
Blog
Resources
Docs
FAQs
API
Legal
Terms
Privacy
Cookie Policy