VisAudit®
Why Visibility
Audit Process
Request Audit
AI-Ready Metadata for Smarter Summaries
Learn More
Does your page give AI a summary to use — or leave it guessing?
Structured tags like data-ai-summary, data-ai-type, or embedded summary lines are fast becoming essential for LLM visibility. These aren’t just SEO helpers — they’re how GPT, Claude, Bing, and Perplexity decide what to quote.
This audit helps you check whether your content includes clear AI-facing summary signals — and whether your tags actually communicate:
Who the page is for
What value it delivers
Why it matters — in plain language
Why This Matters Now:
For the first time, you can literally write what AI will say about you.
Tags like data-ai-summary let you preload the sentence you want GPT or Bing to summarize — before they even read your page.
If you’re not embedding these cues, AI models will guess. And those guesses can miss your value entirely — or worse, quote something vague.
This is your chance to quote yourself — intentionally, structurally, and at scale.
Content Purpose & Page Intent
Structured Tag Planning
Do you currently include any AI-specific meta tags like data-ai-summary or ai-summary?
Tag Yourself.
Audit Question:
Are you explicitly teaching AI engines what your page is about — or hoping they figure it out?
What this means:
Meta tags used to be for Google. Now, they’re for ChatGPT and Claude too.
Tags like data-ai-summary and ai-summary don’t boost rankings — they boost clarity. These tags let you specify how you want your page described in AI summaries, previews, or prompt completions. Instead of hoping the model “gets it,” you give it the script.
Why this matters:
Large Language Models (LLMs) can’t crawl the whole internet on demand. When they reference or suggest your page, they rely on cached or pre-parsed meta data — often including these structured summaries.
If you don’t provide one:
You lose control of what the AI says
It may misrepresent, skip, or reword your value
You miss the chance to guide how you’re positioned
Best Practices:
Add a
<meta name="ai-summary" content="..." />or adata-ai-summary="..."attributeKeep it under 160 characters
Speak plainly — include who it’s for + what value it provides
Use consistent formatting across templates and page types
Think of it like writing your own AI answer block
What type of summary do you currently provide in your metadata?
Tell the Truth Before the Bot Does.
Audit Question:
Is your summary a clear signal — or a foggy placeholder with no real value?
What this means:
AI engines don’t have time for fluff. If your <meta description> or data-ai-summary tag says something like “Innovative solutions for modern problems,” you’ve told them nothing.
Your summary tag should do one thing brilliantly: explain your value in plain, benefit-driven language before the AI invents its own.
Why this matters:
If you leave summaries vague:
LLMs pull guesses from body copy
You lose control of what’s surfaced in AI previews
Your actual value prop might never get seen
Clear summaries help your page appear:
In ChatGPT “preview snippets”
In Perplexity answers
In Bing Chat and Edge sidebar summaries
In GPT-driven plugins and internal tools
Best Practices:
Write your summary like an email subject line + elevator pitch
Cover what the user gets, not just what you do
Say who it’s for and why it’s useful
Avoid jargon, generalities, or salesy filler
Check how it appears across your top pages
Do your summary tags speak in your own words or rely on AI guesses?
Write the Script — or Let the Bot Improvise.
Audit Question:
Are your meta summaries written intentionally — or are you hoping the AI just “gets it right”?
What this means:
When LLMs summarize your page, they prioritize structured signals. If you haven’t clearly written what you want them to say, they’ll guess based on body content — and that guess could miss your most important point.
It’s the difference between submitting your own bio and letting someone else wing your intro on stage.
Why this matters:
Summaries written in your own words:
Improve accuracy in AI-generated results
Ensure the right positioning shows up in previews
Reduce misinterpretation from vague or inferred context
If your summaries aren’t deliberate, you’re giving up control over how you’re introduced by AI.
Best Practices:
Write meta descriptions and AI-summary tags like a quotable one-liner
Pull your best, most defining sentence from the page itself
Make sure your tone reflects your brand — not boilerplate
Use the exact sentence structure you want AI to repeat
Avoid placeholders or relying on first-paragraph pulls
How clearly do your current tags explain who the page is for?
Name Your Reader — Before the AI Names Someone Else.
Audit Question:
Do your summary tags tell LLMs and users who the page is meant to help?
What this means:
AI tools don’t just want to know what your page is about — they’re trying to match it to the right user. If your meta tags don’t include a role, persona, or audience, the AI might surface it to the wrong person — or skip it entirely.
When you say "For RevOps leaders managing Salesforce data," it’s far more useful than "Explore our powerful solutions."
Why this matters:
LLMs prioritize audience-relevant results
Pages that specify “who it’s for” are more likely to be cited in answers
Clear audience targeting = better lead quality and content match
Vague = ignored. Specific = retrieved.
Best Practices:
Include the persona (e.g., “IT teams,” “Compliance managers”) in your title or summary
Pair your audience with the purpose (e.g., “...to automate vendor risk reviews”)
Use plain, direct language like: “For marketers scaling ABM campaigns”
Make it obvious — don’t assume AI will infer it from body text
Do you explain what the page helps someone do?
Outcome, Not Just Overview.
Audit Question:
Do your meta tags make it clear what the visitor will accomplish or learn from the page?
What this means:
AI systems don’t just want descriptions — they want purpose. Saying “AI-enriched automation for finance teams” is nice. But “Helps finance leaders reduce manual reporting by 80%” gives the engine (and the user) a clear reason to click.
This is about framing your page as a tool or answer, not just a topic.
Why this matters:
LLMs prioritize outcome-oriented answers
Pages that highlight what someone will “get” or “do” are more likely to rank or be cited
It strengthens your CTA and boosts real engagement
You’re not just describing a page — you’re promising a result.
Best Practices:
Use verbs that imply action: “Learn how to…”, “Download the checklist to…”, “Explore tactics to…”
Focus on benefits: “Cut implementation time in half” > “Implementation guide”
Keep it short, direct, and written in user-friendly language
Use summaries that help AI respond to intent-based prompts (e.g., “How do I fix X?”)
Plain Language Wins.
Audit Question:
Can someone with no technical background immediately understand your summary tag?
What this means:
Meta summaries are often your first impression. If they’re loaded with jargon or acronyms, both AI models and real users may skip right past. You’re not writing a whitepaper — you’re writing a snippet that should click with humans and machines alike.
LLMs favor clear, digestible language. So do people.
Why this matters:
LLMs prioritize content that’s easy to quote or summarize
Plain language boosts comprehension and conversion
You make your content more accessible to a broader audience — including AI
You don’t need to “dumb it down,” just clarify what matters.
Best Practices:
Avoid industry acronyms unless they’re clearly defined
Swap “solution-oriented platform leveraging automation workflows” for “Tool that helps teams automate repetitive tasks”
Use short, concrete phrases that emphasize outcome and audience
Test your summaries on GPT or Claude and ask: “What does this page do?” — if the answer is confusing, simplify it
If asked to generate a data-ai-summary, could you write one for each page?
If You Can’t Say It, AI Won’t See It.
Audit Question:
Are you equipped to summarize every key page’s value in one sentence — clearly, confidently, and consistently?
What this means:
The data-ai-summary tag is your chance to tell the AI exactly what your page is about. But if you can’t distill your message, how can a machine?
Many teams think they’re clear — until they have to write that one-sentence summary. If this isn’t possible across your site, your AI visibility will be inconsistent or left to guesswork.
Why this matters:
LLMs latch onto strong summaries for citations and previews
Internal clarity improves external discoverability
You turn every page into a candidate for AI answers — not just high-traffic blogs
Best Practices:
Build a repeatable summary framework (e.g., [Audience] + [Problem] + [Outcome])
Write your
data-ai-summaryas if it will be quoted in a ChatGPT replyUse this tag on every evergreen, high-value, or decision-stage page
Treat it as part of your publishing process, not a retroactive fix
Do your summary tags match your tone and site purpose?
"If your tag sounds like a robot, that’s how AI will introduce you."
Audit Question:
Are your AI-specific summary tags written in your brand’s voice — or do they read like filler text from an SEO tool?
What this means:
Just because it's metadata doesn’t mean it should sound mechanical. The tone and clarity of your AI summary tags are crucial — they're often the first (and sometimes only) thing a model sees before referencing your content.
A mismatch between your tag tone and your page tone breaks trust and consistency for both users and AI engines.
Why this matters:
LLMs treat tags like clues — your tone helps establish credibility
Human readers rely on previews, and they'll bounce if it feels off
A polished, branded summary increases citation confidence for AI
Best Practices:
Match the tone of your summaries to your overall voice — whether that’s professional, playful, or punchy
Avoid jargon, buzzwords, or generic phrases (“cutting-edge solutions for innovative teams”)
Write for clarity and character: think “conversation-ready”
Review tags as part of your content QA to ensure alignment with purpose and brand
Are your tags consistent across templates, blog posts, and product pages?
"Consistency is how AI learns who you are — and trusts what you say."
Audit Question:
Do your AI summary tags follow a standardized approach across all major page types — or are they written ad hoc?
What this means:
When tags are inconsistent — different styles, tones, or formats depending on the page — large language models struggle to learn and predict what your site stands for. Consistency builds a semantic fingerprint for your brand in the LLM’s training context.
This question probes whether you have a documented process or system that governs how summary tags are written, regardless of page type.
Why this matters:
Disjointed tags create conflicting signals across your site
AI systems benefit from patterns — consistency improves citation reliability
Uniform tags improve cross-page retrievability and cohesion in responses
Best Practices:
Use a shared template or framework for
data-ai-summaryand similar fieldsStandardize tag creation across your CMS or page builder
Build tag-writing into your content publishing workflow
Run periodic audits across page types (e.g., blogs, products, landing pages) to catch mismatches
Align summary tone, structure, and intent across all your content surfaces
Have you tested how GPT/Claude summarizes your page as-is?
"If AI is your audience, wouldn’t you want to hear what it heard?"
Audit Question:
Have you taken the time to run your live pages through ChatGPT, Claude, or other tools to see how they’re summarized — using only the meta tags and visible text?
What this means:
Testing LLM-generated summaries reveals how clearly your metadata is being interpreted. If your meta tags are vague, too long, or misaligned with your content, the AI-generated output may be confusing, off-topic, or completely miss your value prop.
Most brands still optimize for Google, but LLMs use different logic and structure — and they show different outputs.
Why this matters:
LLMs create summaries, not snippets — clarity is more important than keyword density
You can’t improve what you don’t test
A poor summary means missed opportunities in AI answers, previews, and link expansions
Best Practices:
Paste a live page URL into Perplexity and ask: “What is this page about?”
Use GPT-4 or Claude with:
Summarize this page for someone deciding whether to visit it:Compare the response to your intended messaging
If the AI skips key benefits or misrepresents your offer, your tags need revision
Turn this into a standard QA step before publishing high-value pages
Do your summary tags help your content appear in LLM responses?
"You don’t need to rank #1 if you’re already the answer."
Audit Question:
Are your AI-specific meta tags actually working — showing up in real ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Bing Chat answers — or are they just sitting unused in your code?
What this means:
The goal of adding AI summary tags isn’t just “compliance” or optimization for its own sake — it’s retrieval. If your content is being referenced, quoted, or used as a response by LLMs, your tags are doing their job.
But if your site isn’t showing up, even for branded or niche prompts, it’s likely those tags aren’t clear, structured, or relevant enough to surface in AI ecosystems.
Why this matters:
AI engines are now answer engines — you don’t need a click to earn influence
Showing up in AI outputs means visibility before the search results page
Meta summaries can now trigger retrieval as much as on-page content can
Best Practices:
Run LLM visibility tests weekly across tools (ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Perplexity)
Use structured summaries that clearly state audience, topic, and value
Track where your content is appearing using brand + topic prompts
Monitor prompt-driven performance like you would keyword rankings
Refine summaries on underperforming pages using copywriting best practices
"If you want AI to echo you, speak clearly first."
Audit Question:
Do your AI summary tags intentionally mirror real sentences from your page — or are they abstract, vague, or disconnected from your core messaging?
What this means:
AI models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity prioritize clarity and context. When summary tags align word-for-word with the most valuable or scannable sentences on your page, they act like a pre-approved citation.
If your tags are inconsistent or generic, the model may ignore them — or worse, generate its own interpretation.
Why this matters:
LLMs prefer quotable, well-formed language — not just metadata
Copy/pasted summaries from your page create semantic alignment
Explicit alignment between body copy and metadata increases retrieval confidence
Best Practices:
Write meta tags that reuse or paraphrase real lines from your body content
Start by identifying the most valuable insight or takeaway on the page
Use that exact sentence (or a variant) as your AI summary
Don’t rely on placeholders or generic intros — be intentional
Think of tags as “prompt seeds” that echo your voice
Have you validated your summary tag structure across tools?
"If you never test the signal, don’t be surprised when no one picks it up."
Audit Question:
Have you confirmed that your AI-specific summary tags are correctly recognized and interpreted across tools like Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity?
What this means:
It’s not enough to simply add a <meta data-ai-summary="..."> tag and assume it’s working. Different LLMs and crawlers use different signals to generate their answers — and the only way to be sure your summary is getting picked up is to test it across multiple retrieval methods.
Why this matters:
AI engines vary in how (and if) they parse custom tags
Broken or unrecognized tags mean your summary gets ignored
Validation ensures you’re not “tagging into the void”
Best Practices:
Use GPT-4 to copy/paste your HTML head and ask:
“What summary would you generate based on these tags?”Try plugins or browser tools that visualize metadata (e.g., Meta SEO Inspector)
Ask Bing Chat: “What is [your URL] about?” and check if your tag is quoted
Use manual prompt-testing to compare summaries before and after tag changes
Validate your tag structure is properly closed, escaped, and W3C-compliant
How long are your summary tags on average?
"Think like a billboard: short, clear, and impossible to ignore."
Audit Question:
Are your AI summary tags the right length to be read, parsed, and used effectively by language models and preview engines?
What this means:
LLMs, search engines, and AI assistants often truncate or ignore overly long tags — and dismiss vague, one-word attempts. The sweet spot is clear, concise summaries that fall within the 110–160 character range, structured for readability and relevance.
Why this matters:
Short tags are easier to parse and more likely to be used
Length impacts whether your summary appears in AI answers
Overlong metas reduce clarity and increase truncation risk
Best Practices:
Aim for 110–160 characters per summary
Prioritize front-loaded value: start with who it's for + what it does
Use tools like Yoast or RankMath to preview character counts
Spot-check your tags in AI outputs — are they showing up fully?
Don’t just match SEO rules — write for summarization, not search snippets
Do your summary tags evolve as your messaging changes?
"Your messaging grows. Your summaries should too."
Audit Question:
When your positioning, audience focus, or product evolves — do your meta and AI summary tags change with it?
What this means:
Summary tags aren’t “set it and forget it.” They’re living parts of your content that should reflect your current brand voice, audience priorities, and value propositions. If your messaging matures, your tags must keep up — or you risk misalignment between what your page says and how it’s discovered or described by AI tools.
Why this matters:
AI models surface your old summaries unless you update them
Misaligned tags confuse bots and miss engagement opportunities
Up-to-date summaries = stronger prompt retrieval and clarity
Best Practices:
Review tags quarterly as part of your content or SEO refresh
Add summary tag updates to your page QA or publishing checklist
Track major messaging shifts and audit related meta descriptions
Use LLM prompt testing to validate that your new story is coming through
Create a shared doc or CMS field to manage evolving tag language across teams
Want to know if your meta tags are helping or hurting AI visibility?
Request a Meta Tag Evaluation to see how clearly your content is labeled for ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Claude, and Perplexity.
We’ll assess whether your pages are optimized for AI answers — or overlooked because of vague or outdated tags.
You’ll receive:
AI summarization scorecard
Meta tag alignment review
LLM-specific rewrite recommendations
Audit
Overview
Features
Process
Company
About
Contact
Blog
Resources
Docs
FAQs
API
Legal
Terms
Privacy
Cookie Policy