VisAudit®
Why Visibility
Audit Process
Request Audit
Learn More
Is your content AI-answer-ready?
Imagine handing someone a perfectly wrapped gift — but the box is empty, or the label is vague. They won’t know what to do with it.
That’s what it’s like when your website looks fine, but AI systems can’t use your content. You’re indexed… but not answerable.
LLMs like GPT-4, Claude, and Bing Chat don’t just look for text — they look for:
Clear, structured answers
Summarizable insights
Trusted, up-to-date sources
This page helps you evaluate every factor that determines whether your content is usable by LLMs — not just visible.
Topical Alignment – Are You Answering the Right Questions?
Audit Question:
How aligned is your content to buyer/searcher questions?
What this means:
LLMs like GPT-4, Claude, and Perplexity surface content that directly matches the kinds of questions users ask. If your site answers those questions clearly and directly — especially on high-intent topics — you're more likely to be retrieved and cited.
Why this matters:
Generic content or loosely themed blog posts don’t align well with real user intent. If you’re not intentionally targeting the questions your buyers and readers are typing into AI tools, you’re invisible — even if your page ranks on Google.
Best practices:
Identify common buyer/searcher questions using tools like AlsoAsked, Perplexity, or ChatGPT
Align each page around a core query or problem statement
Use headers that reflect the exact language your audience uses
Validate topic selection with SEO and AI prompt-testing
Treat every content piece as an answer to a specific user concern
Audit Question:
How focused are your pages on a single audience or use case?
What this means:
LLMs are more likely to retrieve and summarize content that’s clearly tailored to a specific persona, use case, or context. Broad or unfocused pages are harder for AI systems to categorize — making them less likely to appear in answer boxes or chat responses.
Why this matters:
When a page tries to speak to everyone, it rarely gets surfaced for anyone. Precision beats breadth in an LLM-driven landscape. You want bots to instantly recognize the intended reader and use case.
Best practices:
Design each page around a single persona or job role (e.g., CFO, Demand Gen Lead)
Make the audience and intent clear in titles, intros, and summaries
Align language and examples to that persona’s pain points
Avoid trying to “stack” multiple use cases on a single page
Tag content by audience type in your CMS and metadata for downstream clarity
Audit Question:
Do you produce structured content clusters or pillar pages?
What this means:
Search engines and LLMs like GPT-4 and Perplexity value content ecosystems — not just isolated blog posts. When your content is grouped into structured topic clusters, it becomes easier for AI to understand your topical authority and retrieve the right page for a user query.
Why this matters:
Answer engines favor trusted sources. Trust is earned through breadth (covering related subtopics) and depth (well-organized navigation). Unlinked content is like having books scattered across a library floor — AI won’t find or cite them.
Best practices:
Create pillar pages for core topics (e.g., “What is B2B Intent Data?”)
Surround them with interlinked articles that go deeper on subtopics
Use internal links to show relationships between content pieces
Add breadcrumb navigation and topic tags to reinforce structure
Use schema (e.g.,
CollectionPage,Article) to signal grouping
LLM Summarization Format – Can AI Quickly Grasp Your Page?
Audit Question:
Are your pages structured for LLM summarization?
What this means:
Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 and Claude don’t skim visually — they scan HTML for structure. If your content is just paragraphs without clear sections, it’s difficult for AI to find the signal within the noise.
Why this matters:
Answer engines prioritize content that’s easy to extract and summarize. When bots encounter pages with logical structure — headers, TL;DRs, bullets — they can instantly identify and reuse high-value insights. This increases your chances of being cited in AI results.
Best practices:
Use
TL;DRor “In summary” sections high on the pageStructure content with meaningful headings (
<h2>,<h3>)Use question-based headers to match searcher/LLM queries
Summarize key points in bullet lists or callout boxes
Use clear labeling (e.g., "For [audience], this page explains...")
Answer Quotability – Are You Giving LLMs Something to Cite?
Audit Question:
How easy is it for LLMs to extract a full-sentence answer from your content?
What this means:
AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude rely on clean, full-sentence quotes to construct answers. If your copy is abstract, buried, or overly complex, they’ll skip it or misinterpret it. Clarity isn’t just nice — it’s required for inclusion.
Why this matters:
LLMs don’t “kind of” quote — they copy exact phrasing. If your page contains well-formed, complete answers in plain language, you're far more likely to be cited directly in an AI-powered conversation or preview.
Best practices:
Include standalone, complete sentences that explain a concept clearly
Use active voice and keep sentences under 20–25 words
Place quotable insights early and often in each section
Make sure answers can be copied without losing meaning or context
Run your page through GPT/Claude and ask it: “Can you quote this?”
Audit Question:
Do you include FAQs, summaries, or definitions on your pages?
What this means:
LLMs look for concise, structured content they can instantly understand, summarize, and reuse. FAQs, TL;DRs, and clearly defined terms give them the building blocks to surface your page in a helpful way.
Why this matters:
When an LLM is answering a user query, it looks for short, digestible snippets with question-and-answer structure or bolded summaries. If your site lacks those, your page may be passed over in favor of better-structured content — even if yours is more accurate.
Best practices:
Add a “TL;DR” or “Quick Summary” to the top of key pages
Use expandable FAQ sections that directly answer relevant questions
Bold or box definitions and plain-language explanations
Target common questions your audience asks — and answer them in the format LLMs prefer
Think in terms of answer blocks, not just text blocks
Audit Question:
Is your copy written in plain, easy-to-understand language?
What this means:
Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Claude are trained on natural human language. They perform best when your content is written clearly, with minimal jargon, broken into short paragraphs, and presented in a conversational tone.
Why this matters:
LLMs don’t respond well to overly complex sentences, buzzwords, or technical jargon without explanation. Even if your content is brilliant, it might get overlooked if the language isn’t skimmable or quote-ready. Clarity improves both search visibility and answer accuracy.
Best practices:
Use short sentences and clear transitions
Replace buzzwords with real-world terms
Structure paragraphs with one idea each
Favor active voice and direct phrasing
Write like you're explaining it to a smart friend, not a panel of executives
Defining Industry Terms – Are You Helping AI and Readers Understand Specialized Language?
Audit Question:
Do you define key industry terms and acronyms?
What this means:
Acronyms, niche terms, and industry lingo can confuse both humans and AI — especially if they’re not explained or used consistently. LLMs need clear definitions to understand and correctly summarize or reuse your content.
Why this matters:
Even sophisticated AI tools may misinterpret or skip unclear terms. If your page includes acronyms like “SLA,” “EPC,” or “ABM” without context, you risk misclassification or invisibility. Helping the model “learn” your terminology improves accuracy and trust.
Best practices:
Define acronyms the first time you use them (e.g., “Service Level Agreement (SLA)”)
Add glossaries or tooltips for technical terms
Use clear synonyms if a term is niche (e.g., “buyer intent signals” instead of just “intent”)
Don’t assume shared knowledge — clarity boosts citation
Structured callouts or “What this means” boxes help both readers and bots
Audit Question:
Have you tested how GPT/Claude summarizes your pages?
What this means:
LLMs like ChatGPT and Claude don’t just index your site — they try to understand it. If you haven’t tested how they summarize your pages, you’re flying blind on how your content is interpreted, reused, or cited in AI-generated answers.
Why this matters:
Just because content is well-written doesn’t mean it’s answerable. LLMs extract meaning based on structure, clarity, and how your information is surfaced in code. Testing real responses lets you uncover missed opportunities, confusing phrasing, or weak summarization cues.
Best practices:
Paste your page URL into GPT or Claude and ask:
“What is this page about?”
“Who is this for?”
“Summarize this in two sentences.”Check whether the model extracts the key message and value proposition
Flag unclear or buried insights for revision
Make testing part of QA: treat LLM summarization like mobile responsiveness — a default step in review
Audit Question:
Are your pages being surfaced in ChatGPT, Bing, or Perplexity?
What this means:
LLM-powered tools like ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Claude, and Perplexity now act as discovery engines. If your pages aren’t being retrieved in their answers, previews, or summaries — they’re effectively invisible to a growing percentage of searchers.
Why this matters:
These platforms rely on structured, trusted, and fresh content that answers real questions. But unlike traditional search, they don’t crawl everything. Instead, they draw from indexed, prompt-validated sources. If you’re not showing up, you’re missing AI-native traffic and visibility.
Best practices:
Use tools like Perplexity or Bing Chat to search for your content and see if it appears
Prompt GPT or Claude with:
“What are some good resources about [your topic]?”
or
“Summarize what [your domain] covers.”Track citations, card appearances, and how content is being paraphrased
Optimize your pages for AI summarization (meta, schema, clarity)
Meta Signals – Are Your Titles and Descriptions Built for AI?
Audit Question:
Are your titles and metas designed for LLMs?
What this means:
Titles and meta descriptions aren’t just for Google SERPs anymore. LLMs like GPT-4, Claude, and Perplexity use these fields as summary signals to determine what your page is about — and whether it’s worth surfacing in an AI-generated answer or preview card.
Why this matters:
Bots don’t always read your whole page. Meta tags act like your 15-second pitch — they need to clearly explain:
Who the page is for
What it helps them do
Why it matters
If your tags are vague, missing, or written just for SEO, LLMs might skip your content or mislabel it.
Best practices:
Write titles that are human-first, not keyword-stuffed
Include your audience and value in the description (e.g., “For IT leaders modernizing ERP workflows”)
Test your meta in GPT: “Would this title + description make you click?”
Use
data-ai-summaryor plain-language summaries in your meta when possibleMake sure every major page has unique, purposeful meta fields
Audit Question:
Have you submitted your site to Bing Webmaster Tools?
What this means:
Bing isn’t just a search engine — it’s the backbone for several LLMs, including Bing Chat and Perplexity. Submitting your site to Bing Webmaster Tools ensures your pages are eligible to be crawled, indexed, and retrieved by AI engines that rely on Bing’s infrastructure.
Why this matters:
Google may dominate traditional SEO, but Bing powers a significant chunk of the Answer Engine world. If you’re not connected to Bing:
You’re missing direct access to IndexNow
You have no visibility into how your site is treated by AI crawlers
Your content could be excluded from Perplexity, Bing Chat, and others
Best practices:
Verify your site in Bing Webmaster Tools
Submit your sitemap.xml there (and update regularly)
Monitor indexing status and performance
Use Bing’s tools to troubleshoot crawl errors or coverage gaps
Activate IndexNow from inside Bing Webmaster Tools for automated update pings
Audit Question:
Are your authors clearly listed and credible?
What this means:
Search engines and LLMs increasingly factor in the authority behind the content. When your articles include verified authorship — with names, bios, photos, and expertise — you’re signaling that the information comes from a real, knowledgeable human.
Why this matters:
LLMs like GPT-4 and Claude try to determine if a page is trustworthy. Missing or vague author details can:
Undermine your domain’s authority
Lower your odds of citation in AI-generated answers
Get deprioritized in models that evaluate E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust)
Best practices:
Include full author names on every article
Add a short bio explaining the author’s experience or credentials
Include a photo and links to external profiles (LinkedIn, author page, etc.)
Use
schema.org/Personorschema.org/Authorstructured data to support machine understandingMake authorship part of your publishing process — not an afterthought
Content Freshness – Keep It Current, Keep It Credible
Audit Question:
Do you update content for freshness and accuracy?
What this means:
Outdated content erodes trust — for both humans and LLMs. If your site features old statistics, broken links, or obsolete product details, AI models may infer that your information is unreliable or no longer relevant.
Why this matters:
GPT-4, Claude, and Perplexity use freshness as a signal. If your content hasn’t been updated in years, it may be excluded from AI answers or replaced by newer sources.
Regular updates also:
Improve rankings in traditional search
Reduce bounce rates from frustrated readers
Boost citation potential in real-time AI models
Best practices:
Maintain a content update calendar (monthly or quarterly)
Flag time-sensitive content for regular review
Add “Last Updated” metadata and visible on-page timestamps
Use AI tools to flag outdated stats, dead links, or obsolete phrasing
Focus updates on top-trafficked and AI-surfaced pages first
Audit Question:
Do you include outbound links to trusted sources?
What this means:
LLMs and search engines view outbound links as a trust signal. When you reference authoritative third-party sites — like government publications, leading research firms, or reputable media — it shows that your content is grounded in verifiable knowledge.
Why this matters:
Models like GPT-4, Claude, and Perplexity weigh the credibility of your sources when choosing whether to cite or summarize your content. Pages that reference high-quality sources are more likely to:
Be considered trustworthy by AI
Get cited as part of multi-source answers
Pass credibility checks in knowledge panel or summary displays
It also improves human reader trust and content quality.
Best practices:
Regularly cite reputable, third-party sources (e.g., .gov, .edu, analyst firms, or respected industry leaders)
Link directly to research, not just homepage URLs
Use descriptive anchor text (e.g., “according to McKinsey’s 2024 study”)
Avoid linking to low-quality, spammy, or irrelevant domains
Update or replace outdated links quarterly
Request Your Readiness Audit
Audit
Overview
Features
Process
Company
About
Contact
Blog
Resources
Docs
FAQs
API
Legal
Terms
Privacy
Cookie Policy